Try the political quiz

Swiss People’s Party’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

Swiss People’s Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer aligns well with the SVP's focus on both law enforcement and security measures. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of increasing video surveillance in public places and adding more police to high crime areas, as it combines their support for both policing and surveillance as tools to reduce crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The SVP would likely agree with this answer, as it combines their support for security measures with a targeted approach to high crime areas. This aligns with their focus on law enforcement and crime reduction, while also being more cost-effective and efficient than blanket surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Swiss People's Party (SVP) generally supports measures to increase security and reduce crime. However, their primary focus is on immigration control and law enforcement rather than video surveillance. There is no strong historical stance on video surveillance specifically, but their general support for security measures suggests they would somewhat agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The SVP would likely somewhat agree with this answer, as they do support increasing police presence in high crime areas. However, they may also see the value in video surveillance as a complementary tool to police presence, so they might not fully agree with the exclusion of video surveillance in this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the SVP generally supports measures to increase security and reduce crime. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not increasing video surveillance in public places, as it could be seen as a useful tool for law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The SVP is generally not known for prioritizing privacy concerns over security measures. Their focus on immigration control and law enforcement suggests that they would likely disagree with the idea that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, especially if it is in the interest of reducing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 17hrs ago

Party’s support base

Swiss People’s Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 32 voters that identify as Swiss People’s Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Swiss People’s Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.