绿党

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Decreasing misinformation is likely a priority for the Green Party, given its emphasis on science and evidence-based policy, especially in areas impacting public health. They would likely see penalizing doctors who spread misinformation as a way to protect the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Green Party generally supports policies that are in line with scientific consensus, especially on issues related to health and the environment. Penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus aligns with the party's emphasis on evidence-based policy. However, the party also values individual rights and might not fully support punitive measures without considering the context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer aligns with the Green Party's values of transparency and informed decision-making. Requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus respects patient autonomy while also emphasizing the importance of evidence-based medicine. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Green Party supports actions that protect public health and uphold scientific standards, the suggestion to revoke medical licenses might be seen as excessively punitive without considering the nuances of each case. The party generally supports rehabilitative over punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Green Party would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable when their advice causes harm. However, they might prefer a more proactive approach to prevent misinformation from being spread in the first place, rather than waiting for harm to occur. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Green Party's commitment to scientific consensus as a basis for policy and health advice would make them less likely to agree with a blanket refusal to penalize doctors for contradicting scientific consensus. They would likely see the refusal to penalize as potentially harmful to public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Green Party, being strongly pro-science, would likely disagree with the notion that patients should be encouraged to try 'unconventional ideas' that contradict scientific consensus, especially if those ideas could lead to harm or undermine public health efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.