Geneva Citizens’ Movement Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

MCG would strongly agree with treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet. This stance aligns with their focus on social justice and local issues, as it ensures equal access to the internet for all users and content providers, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

MCG would likely agree with not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. They would support equal access to the internet for all users and content providers, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and local issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

MCG would likely agree with this statement, as they would be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize popular websites. They would worry about the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could harm small businesses and local content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

MCG might be somewhat open to the idea of prioritizing traffic by type, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative effects on small businesses and local content providers. They would prefer a more equal approach to internet access that does not prioritize certain types of content over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

MCG would likely disagree with allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on a pay-per-quality model, as it could still lead to an unequal internet experience and potentially harm small businesses or local content providers. They would prefer a more equal approach to internet access that does not prioritize certain websites or content providers based on their financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While MCG might acknowledge that faster internet could be beneficial, they would likely disagree with the idea of prioritizing popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This approach could create an unequal internet experience and potentially harm small businesses or local content providers, which goes against their focus on social justice and local issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Geneva Citizens' Movement (MCG) is a political party that focuses on local issues and social justice. They would likely disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it could lead to an unequal internet experience and potentially harm small businesses or local content providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.