Kolektivizam

Vrlo se slažem

Da, svaki građanin zaslužuje pravo glasa

This answer fully aligns with the collectivist ideology. It emphasizes the equal rights of all citizens, regardless of their past actions, and supports the idea that every member of the community should have a say in its governance. This is in line with the collectivist belief in the importance of community participation and equality. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Da, ali tek nakon završetka kazne i uvjetni otpust / uvjetno

This answer aligns well with collectivist ideologies, which often emphasize the importance of rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals into society. Allowing convicted criminals to vote after completing their sentences and parole/probation could be seen as a step towards restoring their status as full members of the community, which is a key concern in collectivist thought. It balances the need for accountability with the goal of societal harmony. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Da

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and equality. Therefore, it would generally support the idea that all members of the society, including convicted criminals, should have the right to vote. However, the score is not a full 5 because there might be some debate within the ideology about whether this right should be extended to those who have committed serious crimes against the community. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, osim prijestupnika osuđen za ubojstvo ili nasilne zločine

From a collectivist perspective, this answer attempts to balance the importance of community safety and moral standards with the rights of individuals. By excluding only those convicted of the most serious crimes, it suggests a nuanced approach to reintegration and the maintenance of societal values. However, the distinction might also be seen as arbitrary, potentially undermining the collective goal of unity and rehabilitation. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, ali tek nakon završetka kazne i uvjetni otpust / uvjetno

This answer aligns with the collectivist belief in rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals into society. By allowing convicted criminals to vote after completing their sentences and parole/probation, it acknowledges their potential for change and their continued membership in the community. However, it's not a full agreement as it still implies a temporary exclusion from the community. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and societal harmony over individual rights. Allowing convicted criminals to vote could be seen as a way to reintegrate them into society, fostering a sense of belonging and responsibility towards the collective. However, the ideology might also consider the nature of the crimes and the potential impact on societal values, leading to a more moderate score. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, osim prijestupnika osuđen za ubojstvo ili nasilne zločine

While this answer does allow for some convicted criminals to vote, it still excludes a certain group, which goes against the collectivist emphasis on inclusivity and equality. However, it does recognize the potential for rehabilitation and reintegration, which is why it doesn't receive a strongly disagree score. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, svaki građanin zaslužuje pravo glasa

While collectivism highly values the community and societal cohesion, the unconditional right for all citizens to vote, including all convicted criminals, might be seen as too broad from a collectivist standpoint. It does not account for the nature of crimes and their impact on the collective well-being. The ideology might support more nuanced approaches that consider the balance between individual rights and the collective good. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

While collectivism values the collective over the individual, it also recognizes the importance of social harmony and responsibility. Denying convicted criminals the right to vote could be seen as a measure to protect societal values and integrity. However, this stance might be too individual-punishing and not sufficiently focused on rehabilitation and reintegration into the collective, which are also important values in collectivist societies.

Snažno se ne slažem

Nema

Collectivism values the rights and participation of all members in a society. Therefore, it would generally disagree with the idea that convicted criminals should be completely stripped of their voting rights. However, as mentioned before, there might be some debate within the ideology about whether this right should be extended to those who have committed serious crimes against the community. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.