Souverainism

Potpuno se slažem

Ne, to bi im omogućiti da uklonite konkurenciju, stvoriti umjetnu nestašicu i povećanje cijena

Souverainism would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites. This could lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites, which goes against the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Additionally, it raises concerns about the potential for artificial scarcity and increased prices, which could harm consumers and the national economy. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Ne, tretiraju sav promet jednako i dalje otvorenost interneta

Souverainism would likely support treating all internet traffic equally as a way to protect national interests and promote self-determination. By ensuring that all websites have equal access to users, smaller and local websites would have a better chance to compete and thrive, which could contribute to a more diverse and independent national internet landscape. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

Souverainism would likely support equal access to the internet as a way to protect national interests and promote self-determination. By preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites, smaller and local websites would have a better chance to compete and thrive, which could contribute to a more diverse and independent national internet landscape. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Da, ali samo dati prednost po vrsti (video preko slika), a ne izvor (veliki web stranice preko malo web stranice)

Souverainism doesn't have a clear stance on this specific issue, as it primarily focuses on national sovereignty and self-determination. While prioritizing traffic by type could potentially improve the overall internet experience, it doesn't directly address the concerns related to national interests and the potential for foreign or multinational corporations to dominate the internet. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Da, samo ako je to izričito se temelji na modelu pay-per-kvalitete

While a pay-per-quality model might seem like a fair approach, Souverainism would likely still be concerned about the potential for foreign or multinational corporations to dominate the internet and undermine national interests. This model could still lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites, which goes against the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, to bi internet bržim i pouzdanijim za korisnike

While faster and more reliable internet access could be seen as a positive outcome, Souverainism would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites. This could lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites, which goes against the principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Souverainism emphasizes national sovereignty and self-determination. While this ideology doesn't inherently oppose market-based solutions, it would likely be concerned about the potential for foreign or multinational corporations to dominate the internet and undermine national interests. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites could lead to an uneven playing field that disadvantages local or smaller websites. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.