この有権者の回答と比較したあなたの回答は次のとおりです。
交通機関 › 公共交通機関
P>P 個人的な答えShort answer: Yes, but preferably privatize it. Long answer: Where I used to live, it took 2 hours to go by bus where it would take 30 minutes to go by car. So yes, public transportation needs to be improved. People need buses to get to work affordably, since having to walk limits their job choices and takes away time from work, family, and sleep. So if we do not have buses, then people will not be able to go to work, and that will be terrible for them and for the economy overall. So if the government does not privatize it, then yes, they should increase spending on transportation, or find a way to make sure the money is used more efficiently so they don't need more money. But it should really be privatized, as companies will keep it cheap to get more people using it and will improve service to be competitive, and it will be one less (major) thing for the government to spend money on. We should prioritize getting out of debt. |
環境 › プラスチック製品の禁止
P>P 個人的な答えいいえ、そうではなく、生分解可能な製品を製造する企業に対する税制上の優遇措置を増やすべきです |
ソーシャル › 同性婚
P>P 個人的な答えNo, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman. Civil unions make it seem acceptable to move in together, which leads to sin and the destruction of souls and the country. |
ソーシャル › LGBTの養子縁組を行う権利
P>P 個人的な答えNo, and only a married man and woman (or XXY with any other gender) should be allowed to adopt. |
ソーシャル › 妊娠中絶
P>P 個人的な答えPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. If abortion besides in these extenuating circumstances is allowed, it should at least be banned after the first three months. |
環境 › 水圧破砕法
P>P 個人的な答えNo, fracking uses fabric softener and other chemicals harmful to the wildlife |
ソーシャル › ニカブ
P>P 個人的な答えYes, we must preserve religious freedom. With the current fear of Muslim attacks, virtually no attacker would wear clothes that easily identify them as Muslim anyway. |
移民 › イスラム教徒の移民禁止
P>P 個人的な答えNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, but we should improve our ability to screen out potential terrorists |
ソーシャル › 性別の職場の多様性
P>P 個人的な答えいいえ。経営陣は、ジェンダーを問わず、もっともふさわしい条件を備えた人々であるべき |
ソーシャル › トランスジェンダーアスリート
P>P 個人的な答えいいえ、アスリートは出生証明書に記載されている生物学的性別に基づいて競争するべきです |
環境 › 企業補助金
P>P 個人的な答えYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring many local residents |
ソーシャル › 戦闘中の女性たち
P>P 個人的な答えYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men. |
環境 › 動物実験
P>P 個人的な答えYes, including cosmetics, because had testing been done, it could have prevented the use of cosmetics that have now been proven to be harmful. Thus, its use in cosmetics is medical. |
人気のある政治テーマについて、この有権者と比較する方法は次のとおりです。
これが、伝統的なイデオロギーの軸でこの有権者と比較する方法です。
© 2024 iSideWith.com.無断転載を禁じます。このサイトを使用すると、当社のユーザー契約とプライバシー ポリシーに同意したものとみなされます。 iSideWith.com は、小売業者とのアフィリエイト パートナーシップの一環として、当社のサイトを通じて購入された製品から売上の一部を得る場合があります。 iSideWith.com の事前の書面による許可がない限り、このサイトの素材を複製、配布、送信、キャッシュ、またはその他の方法で使用することはできません。