この有権者の回答と比較したあなたの回答は次のとおりです。
移民 › 犯罪を犯した移民の強制送還
8>8 個人的な答えSeems like a lot of work to deport them to me. Send them to jail where they can learn the consequences of their crime and undergo a rehabilitation process so that they can be made into a civilian fit for being implemented back into society. |
環境 › プラスチック製品の禁止
8>8 個人的な答えはい |
ソーシャル › LGBTの養子縁組を行う権利
8>8 個人的な答えはい |
科学 › 原子力エネルギー
8>8 個人的な答えI don't know enough about this topic to truly say whether or not I support the use of it. However, I do know humans are idiots and can't handle such technology as is evident by incidents like the Chernobyl and Three Mile Island disasters. Don't forget the Fukushima Daiichi power plant that was brought down by a tsunami and earthquake either. If we can't protect things like that against mother nature, we shouldn't use it until we have proper measures in place to defend against such; otherwise, we'll face the consequences of being ill prepared. ANOTHER thing, we can't properly dispose of radioactive waste without major risks to the environment and population. Why create something dangerous with no option of removing it? Well, there's a lot of reasons to do that but my point remains, it's not wise. Overall, I say nuclear energy is too much for us and shouldn't be used as a result. |
移民 › イスラム教徒の移民禁止
8>8 個人的な答えはい、そして政府が審査プロセスを改善するまでは全ての移民を禁止するべき |
経済問題 › 政府支出
8>8 個人的な答えTo quote the very first line from the song "Wild Child", by the band Heart, "It's too late to turn back". What I mean is that no matter what is done, there will be no reducing the national debt at this point. Hug your family and wait for it to claim us all. |
選挙 › 犯罪歴のある政治家
8>8 個人的な答えIt depends on the severity of the crime and if they have grown from it or not. If it was simple thievery then yeah, let them have a shot at office. If they committed murder, then no. |
選挙 › 選挙権年齢の下限
8>8 個人的な答えI'm real tired of boomers electing terrible people for office, the minimum voting age should be lowered for sure. |
犯罪 › 犯罪者の投票権
8>8 個人的な答えVoting doesn't do you any good in the first place. |
内政 › ドラッグポリシー
8>8 個人的な答えDrug use is fine when prescribed by a doctor and purely medical. I also think it's fine for a person to use some drugs by their own accord: long as they keep it to themselves and the drugs in question don't affect them mentally. |
外交政策 › 外国支援
8>8 個人的な答え増額すべき、ただし、人権侵害のない国に限る |
経済問題 › 税金
8>8 個人的な答えI don't exactly like rich people, they only screw us (there are some exceptions though); therefore, I think taxes should be raised on the rich to get back at them. Hm? What's that? Who cares about the opinion of a middle wage man? Well think about it Mr. Richie Rich, fellow rich people are just competition right? Don't forget either, if you're rich you probably have an ego and wanna dominant everyone else correct? So what's the problem if other wealthy individuals are getting screwed, just use your own money to outlast them and watch as they wither away beneath your boot. Of course, this situation isn't ideal for a money bag who can't outlast his competition but I've already convinced the top competitor this would be a good outcome to have come into fruition. |
犯罪 › 警察の資金調達
8>8 個人的な答えFunding should go into making the world a better place don't you think? Police are cool and all don't get me wrong, some of them do a good job. However, police are individuals like everyone else and therefore can't be expected to uphold the law. I mean, all I hear about police nowadays is how violent they are. If you ask me, it's pointless to have police. What keeps us in check is the money we'll have to spend in court for committing a crime and the fact one may spend a lot of time in a box. As for social and community based programs, I guess it just depends on what they're trying to do. If they are trying to raise money to fix up an orphanage or something, then yea give them the funding. Have someone to review their plans, what they'll spend the money on, how they will use said money in their plans and make a decision on whether or not it is worth funding. |
経済問題 › 最低賃金
8>8 個人的な答えI mean, the government would never do something like this and I can understand their decision logically. That being said, what other answer did you expect me to give? A hopeful statement that they should? That's unrealistic sweetie. |
人気のある政治テーマについて、この有権者と比較する方法は次のとおりです。
最も重要重要な1質問に基づいています。
最も重要重要な1質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた2質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた3質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要な1質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた2質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた3質問に基づいています。
ある程度重要なランク付けされた2質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要な1質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要な1質問に基づいています。
より少ない重要なランク付けされた3質問に基づいています。
これが、伝統的なイデオロギーの軸でこの有権者と比較する方法です。
© 2024 iSideWith.com.無断転載を禁じます。このサイトを使用すると、当社のユーザー契約とプライバシー ポリシーに同意したものとみなされます。 iSideWith.com は、小売業者とのアフィリエイト パートナーシップの一環として、当社のサイトを通じて購入された製品から売上の一部を得る場合があります。 iSideWith.com の事前の書面による許可がない限り、このサイトの素材を複製、配布、送信、キャッシュ、またはその他の方法で使用することはできません。