@8KTRBGL

M>M  개인 답변For certain cases the death penalty can be used, it all depends on the circumstance

M>M  개인 답변Yes, with exceptions for medical reasons

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변Yes, unless they have committed a crime Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism

M>M  개인 답변I'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

M>M  개인 답변아니오, 풍력, 수력, 토륨, 지열 같은 더 깨끗한 대체에너지에 투자해야 합니다.

M>M  개인 답변No, they should have a choice but it should be heavily recommended, seeing as it is our countries main language.

M>M  개인 답변Not all at once, but try to gradually phase them out

M>M  개인 답변It depends on what the drug is, if it is something like weed, they shouldn't receive the death penalty. If they are trafficking drugs like Heroin, Cocaine, or other harmful drugs, they should be arrested, if they repeat their offense a few more times they receive the death penalty for endangering lives.

M>M  개인 답변Yes, but find a way to continue the process in such a way where it posess no threat to the enviornment

M>M  개인 답변Yes, but do not deport them if they fail, they can still remain Legal Residents until they pass the Civics test. And we should have mandatory Civic classrooms in all public schools.

M>M  개인 답변낙태 찬성

M>M  개인 답변아니요

M>M  개인 답변Need more information on the subject

M>M  개인 답변If you be come a legal citizen you should have the right to vote

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변I'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

M>M  개인 답변No, we should end private prisons and instead provide a better funded and rehabilitation-based prison system.

M>M  개인 답변No, the United States should not assassinate any suspected terrorist without concrete, undeniable evidence that they have attack or are planning to attack our nation. Also, once such evidence were to manifest itself we should then obtain both congressional approval along with approval from that sovereign state to enter their country to capture, not kill, said suspected terrorist.

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변Keep voting age at 18, but if a minor can pass a US citizenship test then allow them equal right to vote as well.

M>M  개인 답변Yes, but only if accompanied by treatment and rehabilitation

M>M  개인 답변아니오, 대신에 거대 다국적 기업에 대한 세금을 올려야 합니다.

M>M  개인 답변yes, those who are expected to run the country on behalf of the american citizens should have total transparency and that it should be something that should be common

M>M  개인 답변Increase, but penalize companies taking advantage of this program to decrease wages

M>M  개인 답변Neither, They should only increase the military spending when it necessary.

M>M  개인 답변insufficient knowledge

M>M  개인 답변I don’t know

M>M  개인 답변maybe, it just depends on the crime they committed.

M>M  개인 답변No, but if a business has an extreme gender imbalance on their board of directors then an investigation must be started to find out if the business has a gender bias

M>M  개인 답변Depends on the company, how the local people feel about it, statistics and environmental impact.

M>M  개인 답변No, they should just serve their sentence

M>M  개인 답변아니오, 이것은 단지 상징적인 천 조각일 뿐입니다.

M>M  개인 답변No, there should be an age limit instead

M>M  개인 답변Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge

M>M  개인 답변예, 비폭력 전화에 대해 경찰을 비무장 커뮤니티 기반 응답자로 대체합니다.

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence, as long as the crime was not committed while in office, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, and as long as they are not under investigation of a crime,

M>M  개인 답변예

M>M  개인 답변don't think there is a good answer

M>M  개인 답변아니요, 종교에 따른 이민 금지는 반헌법적입니다

M>M  개인 답변Depends on situation. Generally, no as free trade is good. But if a country is engaging in unfair restrictive trade, then we should able to respond.

M>M  개인 답변Yes, the should be required to take classes to better their chances of becoming law abiding citizens. Classes such as stress and anger management, education skills which will enable them to find productive work

M>M  개인 답변Yes, but only marijuana. Unless someone committed a violent crime they should be sent to to a rehabilitation facility.

M>M  개인 답변No but they should have a year of civic duty that can include military service

M>M  개인 답변Yes, as long as None of it is used for hurting people or for stealing their stuff

M>M  개인 답변예,하지만 다른 국가가 기부하는 금액에 비례합니다.

M>M  개인 답변Decrease, but only give aid to the country's that are in need.

M>M  개인 답변I'm not informed enough to form a full opinion

M>M  개인 답변The simple answer is yes, but the true answer is far more complicated. If athletes continue to be separated by gender than there will absolutely be conflict, however if athletes are separated by something else, be it hormone levels, chromosomes, or their choice, than maybe a balance can be struck.

M>M  개인 답변i dont know

M>M  개인 답변Yes, but they should be treated as humanely as possible.

M>M  개인 답변그럼에도 불구하고, 최저임금은 연령대에 따라 조정되어야 합니다.

M>M  개인 답변No, but they should be regulated to ensure they are not creating a monopoly or having too much influence on social-political issues

M>M  개인 답변이론적으로, 도움이되지만 최근에 손상된하고 그들의 힘을 제한해야한다

M>M  개인 답변현재의 세율을 유지하되 감면제도를 없애고 헛점을 보완해야 합니다.

M>M  개인 답변Unsure about issue

M>M  개인 답변예, 하지만, 양성 반응자에 대해서만 치료를 제공합니다.

M>M  개인 답변아니요