Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › LGBT收养权
Q>Q Personal answer是，只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
Q>Q Personal answer不，我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
移民 › 双重国籍
Q>Q Personal answer是，除非他们实施了犯罪 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
Q>Q Personal answer不应该，判处他们终身监禁，且不得假释 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Q>Q Personal answer不，但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
医保 › 精神健康
Q>Q Personal answer应该，但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金，而不是资助制药公司 |
移民 › 移民同化
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但是要加大监督力度 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Q>Q Personal answerNo, our constitution gives rights to foreigners, but one of those rights isn't voting. Voting should only be given to citizens. Voting allows citizens to dictate what they want their country to do or who they wish to represent them. Foreigners don't need to decide what we do with our country, and immigrants who are not naturalized should become a citizen if they wish to see the country they wish to call home change in their favor. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Q>Q Personal answer不，社交媒体公司是私有公司，不应受政府监管 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
Q>Q Personal answer不，这将鼓励人们不工作，并对经济增长带来伤害 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Q>Q Personal answerNo. If the government sentences someone to prison, why should their punishment be dealt by someone other than the government. |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
医保 › 安全港
Q>Q Personal answer应该，吸毒应当被视为健康问题，而非刑事问题。 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
Q>Q Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
Q>Q Personal answerNo. The way changes are going about in school, with introduction of widely controversial ideas, children need to be allowed to be children for as long as possible. We need to introduce civics in every grade, but not one sided political thinking hoping to flip elections with highly brainwashed sixteens year old's who only know what their teacher, media, and parents have told them. Not from what they learned and have processed through readings of multitudes of historical political writers. |
经济 › 政府支出
Q>Q Personal answer是，而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
社会 › 堕胎
Q>Q Personal answerGovernment shouldn't be involved in a moral situation. Abortion shouldn't be illegal, nor be funded or covered by the government. Abortions should be done in a hospital, where you have more discretion and privacy. Insurers should be allow to cover abortions through the purchase of private health coverage. That way the only people who want a abortion can have an abortion, and the only people who don't don't. No one knows who had one, and no one cares. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
Q>Q Personal answerInstead of the candidates, how about the people already in office. As we know their salaries already, they should tell us how they achieved their new found wealth. |
移民 › 技术移民
Q>Q Personal answer增加，我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
Q>Q Personal answer减少 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Q>Q Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Q>Q Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
Q>Q Personal answer不，政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但是在他们完成服刑之后 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Q>Q Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
Q>Q Personal answer不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
Q>Q Personal answer应该，只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
医保 › 大麻
Q>Q Personal answer是的，并且将其合法化，对其征税和管理，而不是将其入罪化 |
移民 › 公民考试
Q>Q Personal answer应该，而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
经济 › 税
Q>Q Personal answerWe need a new bracket system that stays progressive, but has higher thresholds between each bracket and possible even a bracket that goes past $500,000 but not 50%. |
外交政策 › 以色列
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但是尊重以色列的主权，不干涉它应该如何与邻国处理关系 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
Q>Q Personal answer应该，任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
医保 › World Health Organization
Q>Q Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Q>Q Personal answer是的，但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
Q>Q Personal answer不应该，服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
Q>Q Personal answer是的，并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
Q>Q Personal answer减少，我们不应该给任何国家对外援助 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
Q>Q Personal answer是，只要报告离岸收入 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Q>Q Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
环境 › Animal Testing
Q>Q Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Q>Q Personal answerNo, but we should dictate how much these companies can collect from private citizens. |
经济 › 工会
Q>Q Personal answer破坏，我支持一些私人工会但是强烈反对公共工会 |
社会 › Gender Transition
Q>Q Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
经济 › 公司税
Q>Q Personal answer保持当前税率，但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
经济 › 社会福利
Q>Q Personal answerWe don't need less or more benefits or restrictions, just correctly directed benefits. Any benefit given by the federal government should be precise. An example: Food stamps should be more like WIC, as some food stamps are used to buy junk food, instead of the much needed fruits, vegetables, grains, and meats needed. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Q>Q Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.
